Open Access Journal

ISSN : 2394-2320 (Online)

International Journal of Engineering Research in Computer Science and Engineering (IJERCSE)

Monthly Journal for Computer Science and Engineering

Open Access Journal

International Journal of Engineering Research in Computer Science and Engineering (IJERCSE)

Monthly Journal for Computer Science and Engineering

ISSN : 2394-2320 (Online)

Hypothetical Analysis about computational feasibility of Time Travel

Author : Viplove Divyasheesh 1 Anil Pandey 2 Abhishek Dixit 3

Date of Publication :17th May 2017

Abstract: Time Travelling has always been considered a fantasy never fulfilled .There have been many assumptions regarding how to fold the fabric of space time to let light reach from point A to Point B without travelling the entire length, and this all has been seen from the scientific point of view . But no one has put forward an apt representation as to can us or can we not produce Time travel computationally? The feasibility of this problem is aptly and properly analyzed in this paper and we have tried t o reach a final consensus if time travel is computationally feasible at all or not?

Reference :

    1. Andr_eka, H., N_emeti, I., and W• uthrich, C. (2008), `A twist in the geometry of rotating black holes: seeking the cause of acausality', General Relativity and Gravitation 40: 1809-1823.
    2. Arntzenius, F. (2S006), `Time travel: double your fun', Philosophy Compass 1: 599-616.
    3. Arntzenius, F., and Maudlin, T. (2005), `Time travel and modern physics', in E. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/time-travel-phys/.
    4. Barcel_o, C., and Visser, M. (2002), `Twilight for the energy conditions?', International Journal of Modern Physics D11: 1553-1560.
    5. Belot, G. (2005), `Dust, Time, and Symmetry', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56: 255- 91.
    6. Black, M. (1956), `Why cannot an e_ect precede its cause?', Analysis 16: 49-58.
    7. Bombelli, L., Lee, J., Meyer, D., and Sorkin, R.D. (1987), `Space-time and a causal set', Physical Review Letters 59: 521-524.
    8. Bonnor, W. B. (2001), `The interactions between two classical spinning particles', Classical and Quantum Gravity 18: 1381-1388.
    9. Boyda, E.K., Ganguli, S., Ho_rava, P., and Varadarajan, U. (2003), `Holographic protection of chronology in universes of the G• odel type', Physical Review D67: 106003.
    10. Breckenridge, J.C., Myers, R.C., Peet, A.W., and Vafa, C. (1997), `D-branes and spinning black holes', Physics Letters B391: 93-98.
    11. Callender, C., and Weingard, R. (2000), `Topology change and the unity of space', Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31: 227- 246.
    12. Cho, H.T., and Kantowski, R. (1994), `Measure on a subspace of FRW solutions and he atness problem" of standard cosmology', Physical Review D50: 6144-6149.
    13. Coule, D.H. (1995), `Canonical measure and the atness of a FRW universe', Classical and Quantum Gravity 12: 455-469.
    14. Deutsch, D. (1991), `Quantum mechanics near closed timelike lines', Physical Review D44: 3197- 3217.
    15. Dorato, M. (2002), `On becoming, cosmic time, and rotating universes', in C. Callender (ed.), Time, Reality, and Existence (Cambridge University Press), 253-76.
    16. Douglas, R. (1997) `Stochastically branching spacetime topology', in S. Savitt (ed.), Time's Arrow Today (Cambridge University Press), 173-190.
    17. Dummett, M. (1964), `Bringing about the past', Philosophical Review 73: 338-359.
    18. Dyson, L. (2004), `Chronology protection in string theory', Journal of High Energy Physics 3: 024. [19] Earman, J. (1986), A Primer on Determinism (Kluwer Academic). 40
    19. Earman, J. (1995), Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers, and Shrieks: Singularities and Acausalities in Relativistic Spacetimes (Oxford University Press).
    20. Earman, J. (2008), `Pruning some branches from ranching spacetimes" ', in D. Dieks (ed.), The Ontology of Spacetime II (Elsevier), 187-205.

Recent Article