1. 1. Cloud Security Alliance, “Security guidance for critical areas of focus in cloud computing v3.0,” CSA, Tech. Rep., 2003
   2. Y. Zhang, J. Chen, R. Du, L. Deng, Y. Xiang, and Q. Zhou, “Feacs: A flexible and efficient access control scheme for cloud computing,” in Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications, 2014 IEEE 13th International Conference on, Sept 2014, pp. 310–319.
   3. B. Waters, “Ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption: An expressive, efficient, and provably secure realization,” in Public Key Cryptography - PKC 2011, 2011, vol. 6571, pp. 53–70.
   4. B. B and V. P, “Extensive survey on usage of attribute based encryption in cloud,” Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, vol. 6, no. 3, 2014
   5. V. Goyal, O. Pandey, A. Sahai, and B. Waters, “Attribute-based encryption for fine-grained access control of encrypted data,” in Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, ser. CCS ’06, New York, NY, USA, 2006, pp. 89–98.
   6. InterNational Committee for Information Technology Standards, “INCITS 494-2012 - information technology - role based access control - policy enhanced,” INCITS, Standard, Jul. 2012.
   7. E. Coyne and T. R. Weil, “Abac and rbac: Scalable, flexible, and auditable access management,” IT Professional, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 14–16, 2013.
   8. Empower ID, “Best practices in enterprise authorization: The RBAC/ABAC hybrid approach,” Empower ID, White paper, 2013.
   9. D. R. Kuhn, E. J. Coyne, and T. R. Weil, “Adding attributes to rolebased access control,” Computer, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 79–81, 2010.
   10. G. Ateniese, K. Fu, M. Green, and S. Hohenberger, “Improved Proxy Re-encryption schemes with applications to secure distributed storage,” ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 2006.
   11. F. Wang, Z. Liu, and C. Wang, “Full secure identitybased encryption scheme with short public key size over lattices in the standard model,” Intl. Journal of Computer Mathematics, pp. 1–10, 2015.
   12. M. Green and G. Ateniese, “Identity-based proxy reencryption,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Applied Cryptography and Network Security, ser. ACNS ’07. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2007, pp. 288–306.
   13. A. Lawall, D. Reichelt, and T. Schaller, “Resource management and authorization for cloud services,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Subject-Oriented Business Process Management, ser. S-BPM ONE ’15, New York, NY, USA, 2015, pp. 18:1–18:8.
   14. D. Y. Chang, M. Benantar, J. Y.-c. Chang, and V. Venkataramappa, “Authentication and authorization methods for cloud computing platform security,” Jan. 1 2015, uS Patent 20,150,007,274.
   15. R. Bobba, H. Khurana, and M. Prabhakaran, “Attribute-sets: A practically motivated enhancement to attribute-based encryption,” in Computer Security - ESORICS 2009. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009, vol. 5789, pp. 587–604.
   16. G. Wang, Q. Liu, and J. Wu, “Hierarchical attributebased encryption for fine-grained access control in cloud storage services,” in Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, ser. CCS ’10, New York, NY, USA, 2010, pp. 735–737
   17. J. Liu, Z. Wan, and M. Gu, “Hierarchical attribute-set based encryption for scalable, flexible and finegrained access control in cloud computing,” in Information Security Practice and Experience. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, vol. 6672, pp. 98– 107.
   18. W3C OWL Working Group, “OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Document overview (second edition),” World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), W3C Recommendation, Dec. 2012.
   19. J. M. A. Calero, J. M. M. Perez, J. B. Bernabe, F. J. G. Clemente, G. M. Perez, and A. F. G. Skarmeta, “Detection of semantic conflicts in ontology and rulebased information systems,” Data & Knowledge Engineering, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 1117 – 1137, 2010.