Open Access Journal

ISSN : 2394-2320 (Online)

International Journal of Engineering Research in Computer Science and Engineering (IJERCSE)

Monthly Journal for Computer Science and Engineering

Open Access Journal

International Journal of Engineering Research in Computer Science and Engineering (IJERCSE)

Monthly Journal for Computer Science and Engineering

ISSN : 2394-2320 (Online)

Feature Vectors Generation for Mammogram Classification based on 2-D GLCM matrix

Author : Shehnaz Begum Sk 1 T. K. Mishra 2

Date of Publication :8th September 2017

Abstract: Earlier is the diagnosis of a disease, better is the rate of recovery. So far as the fatal disease like breast cancer is concerned, it’s early diagnosis may lead to improve the rate of care and thereby survival of a patient. Generally, breast cancer detection and analysis starts from capturing the Mammogram of the effected breast region. In this paper, an automated diagnosis scheme has been proposed for detecting the presence/ absence of breast cancer from such mammograms. Suitable pre-processing is applied to input mammogram images. For the feature extraction, the gray level co-occurrence matrix is framed out of the preprocessed image. The AdaBoost technique has been used for the purpose of feature selection. Classification is carried out with the help of the state-of-the-art Random-forest classifier. For the purpose of validation, the mammography image analysis society (MIAS) database has been taken into consideration. Satisfactory classification rate of 94% is achieved through the proposed scheme.

Reference :

    1. A. C. Society, Global Cancer Facts & Figures.
    2. S. D. N. D. A. G. O. G. L. Tabar, G. Fagerberg, “Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer,” Radiol. Clin. N. Am., vol. 02, no. 30, pp. 187–210, 1992.
    3. P. S. L. V. R. R. S. Shapiro, W. Venet, “Selection, follow-up and analysis in the health insurance plan study: a randomized trial with breast cancer screening,” J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr., vol. 03, no. 67, pp. 65–74, 1985.
    4. B. C. S. W. L.L. Humphrey, M. Helfand, “Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the u.s. preventive services task force,” Ann. Intern. Med., vol. 04, no. 137, pp. 347–367, 2002.
    5. D. S. G. W. F.M. Hall, J.M. Storella, “Nonpalpable breast lesions: Recommendations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography,” Radiology, vol. 167, no. 167, pp. 353–358, 1988.
    6. G. W. P. J. S. E. H. D.A. Hall, C.A. Hulka, “Positive predictive value of breast biopsy performed as a result of mammography: there is no abrupt change at age 50 years,” Radiology, vol. 200, pp. 357–360, 1996.
    7. R. B.-B. B. G. J. L. R. D. R. R. S.-B. B. Y. E.A. Sickles, D.L. Migioretti, “Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography,” Radiology, vol. 235, pp. 775– 790, 2005.
    8. A. K.-L. H. G. A. R. S. J. H. S. D. Gur, L.P. Wallace, “Trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography in an academic practice,” Radiology, vol. 235, pp. 396–401, 2005.
    9. L. A.-E. S. C. L. B. M. G. P. C. K. K. D. B. D. W. W. B. R. B.-B. R.D. Rosenberg, B.C. Yankaskas, “Performance benchmarks for screening mammography,” Radiology, vol. 241, pp. 55–66, 2006.
    10. M. U. T.W. Freer, “Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center,” Radiology, vol. 220, pp. 781–786, 2001.
    11. D. I. R.L. Birdwell, P. Bandodkar, “Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting,” Radiology, vol. 236, pp. 451–457, 2005.
    12. J. R. T.E. Cupples, J.E. Cunningham, “Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program,” AJR, vol. 185, pp. 944–950, 2005.
    13. M. R.-T. W. D. A. C. P. J. S. N. S. S.-G. H.P. Chan, B. Sahiner, “Improvement of radiologists characterization of mammographic masses by using coputer-aided diagnosis an roc study,” Radiology, vol. 212, pp. 817– 827, 1999.
    14. C. V.-C. M. Z. Huo, M.L. Giger, “Breast cancer: effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis observer study with independent database of mammograms,” Radiology, vol. 224, pp. 560–568, 2002.
    15. R. S.-C. M. M. G. K. D. Y. Jiang, R.M. Nishikawa, “Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis,” Acad. Radiol., vol. 06, pp. 22–32, 1999.
    16. J. L. D. R.M. Rangayyan, F.J. Ayres, “A review of computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer: toward the detection of subtle signs,” J. Frankl. Inst., vol. 344, pp. 312–348, 2007.
    17. A. H. M. Elter, “Cadx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifications: a review,” Med. Phys., vol. 36, pp. 2052–2068, 2009.
    18. B. Z. M. Tan, J. Pu, “Optimization of breast mass classification using sequential forward floating selection (sffs) and a support vector machine (svm) model,” Int. J CARS, vol. 09, pp. 1005–1020, 2014.

Recent Article