Date of Publication :25th February 2017
Abstract: A human like independent robot which is competent to adjust with the changing of its condition and keep on arriving at its objective is considered as Humanoid Robot. These qualities varies the Android from the other sort of robots. In recent there has been a lot of progress in the improvement of Humanoid and still there are a great scopes in this field. Various research are keen on this region and attempting to structure and build up a different foundation of Humanoid dependent on mechanical and natural idea. Numerous specialists center on the structuring of lower middle to make the Robot exploring as like as a typical person do. Structuring the lower middle which incorporates west, hip, knee, lower leg and toe, is the more complicated and all the more testing task. Upper middle strategy is another complex however interesting task that incorporates the structure of arms and neck. Examination of strolling stride, ideal control of numerous engines or then again different actuators, controlling the Degree of Freedom (DOF), adaptability control and knowledge are additionally the provoking tasks to make a Humanoid to carry on like a human. Essentially examine on this field joins an assortment of disciplines which make it more interesting territory in Mechatronics Engineering. In a different stages for Humanoid Robot advancement are distinguished and portrayed dependent on the transformative research on mechanical technology. It is very significant and powerful to investigate the improvement periods of androids on account of its Business, Educational and Research esteem.
Reference :
-
- T. B. Sheridan, “Human-Robot Interaction,” Human Factors. 2016, doi: 10.1177/0018720816644364.
- R. Splinter, “Biomechanics,” in Handbook of Physics in Medicine and Biology, 2010.
- N. A. Radford et al., “Valkyrie: NASA’s First Bipedal Humanoid Robot,” J. F. Robot., 2015, doi: 10.1002/rob.21560.
- K. Gray and D. M. Wegner, “Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley,” Cognition, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.007.
- M. Lee, U. Nehmzow, and M. Rodriguez, “Towards cognitive robotics: Robotics, biology and developmental psychology,” in The Complex Mind: An Interdisciplinary Approach, 2012, pp. 103–125.
- H. T. Choi and J. Yuh, “Underwater robots,” in Springer Handbook of Robotics, 2016.
- K. Csorba, D. Varga, G. Tevesz, and I. Vajk, “The RobonAUT autonomous mobile robot construction contest ?,” in IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFACPapersOnline), 2012, vol. 9, no. PART 1, pp. 360–365, doi: 10.3182/20120619-3- RU-2024.00031.
- Z. F. Bao, P. Zang, and J. P. Wang, “The design and control of the humanoid walking robot,” in Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, vol. 380–384, pp. 328– 331, doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.380- 384.328.
- S. Corrigan and I. Interface, “Introduction to the Controller Area Network ( CAN ),” Texas Instruments, no. August 2002, pp. 1– 17, 2016.
- K. Hu, C. Ott, and D. Lee, “Learning and Generalization of Compensative ZeroMoment Point Trajectory for Biped Walking,” IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 717–725, 2016, doi: 10.1109/TRO.2016.2553677.