Author : Tulika Kanwar 1
Date of Publication :6th August 2022
Abstract: Leukemia is a blood cancer mutates inside the bone marrow. If unidentified at an early stage, it can lead to severe consequences and later death of a person. To diagnose leukemia, machines and manpower skills are required to identify if the illustrative image is healthy or unhealthy. The manual observation of the large number of images may lead to error in the results. One of the biggest barriers in the result's accuracy is identification of concerned region in the overlapped cells. Motivated by the challenges, framework is developed based on image processing for automatic detection of White Blood Cells in the peripheral blood smear image. In this paper, canny edge detection with Circular Hough Transform is applied to count the number of white blood cells. The outcome is to obtain the classification of the sample images whether the sample is unhealthy or healthy sample image. Total 108 multi-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia images are considered. It was found that the proposed cell separation method yields an accuracy of 98% in comparison to state of the art segmentation technique.
Reference :
-
- Henry JB. Clinical diagnosis and management by laboratory methods. 17th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1989
- T. Terwilliger and M. Abdul-Hay, “Acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a comprehensive review and 2017 update,” Blood Cancer J., vol. 7, no. 6, p. e577, 2017, doi: 10.1038/bcj.2017.53.
- Huether, S.E. and McCance, K.L., 2019. Understanding Pathophysiology-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences
- Access to Clinical Trials & Free Patient Support. https://www.lls.org/
- K. K. Anilkumar, V. J. Manoj, and T. M. Sagi, “A survey on image segmentation of blood and bone marrow smear images with emphasis to automated detection of Leukemia,” Biocybern. Biomed. Eng., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1406–1420, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.bbe.2020.08.010
- R. B. Hegde, K. Prasad, H. Hebbar, and I. Sandhya, “Peripheral blood smear analysis using image processing approach for diagnostic purposes: A review,” Biocybern. Biomed. Eng., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 467–480, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.bbe.2018.03.002.
- N. M. Zaitoun and M. J. Aqel, “Survey on Image Segmentation Techniques, Procedia - Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 65, no. Iccmit, pp. 797–806, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.027.
- C. Lin, “PT,” Neurocomputing, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.06.053 lymphoblastic leukemia: a comprehensive review and 2017 update,” Blood Cancer J., vol. 7, no. 6, p. e577, 2017, doi: 10.1038/bcj.2017.53.
- K. Sudha and P. Geetha, “A novel approach for segmentation and counting of overlapped leukocytes in microscopic blood images,” Biocybern. Biomed. Eng., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 639– 648, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.bbe.2020.02.005.
- F. Al-Hafiz, S. Al-Megren, and H. Kurdi, “Red blood cell segmentation by thresholding and canny detector,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 141, pp. 327–334, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.193.
- E. O. Fernandez et al., “Microcontroller-Based Automated Microscope for Image Recognition of Four Urine Constituents,” IEEE Proposed method Comparison of edge detection 7
- Y. Pan, T. Zhou, and Y. Xi, “Bacterial foraging-based edge detection for cell image segmentation,” Proc. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. EMBS, vol. 2015-November, pp. 3873–3876, 2015, doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319239
- P. Choudhry, “High-Throughput method for automated colony and cell counting by digital image analysis based on edge detection,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1–23, 2016, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148469.
- The datasets used in the classification of peripheral blood sm, available at: https://www.kaggle.com/ datasets (accessed: May, 9, 2021).
- J. Canny, “A Computational Approach to Edge Detection,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. PAMI-8, no. 6, pp. 679– 698, 1986, doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.1986.4767851.
- S. Fatonah, H. Tjandrasa, and C. Fatichah, “Identification of acute lymphoblastic leukemia subtypes in touching cells based on enhanced edge detection,” Int. J. Intell. Eng. Syst., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 204
- A. Ahirwar, “Study of techniques used for medical image segmentation and computation of statistical test for region classification of brain mri,” IJ Information Technology and Computer Science, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 44–53, 2013.
- G.-S. Chen, L.-W. Ko, B.-C. Kuo, and S.-C. Shih, “A two-stage featureextraction for hyperspectral image data classification,” in IGARSS 2004. 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, vol. 2. IEEE, 2004, pp. 1212-1215.
- A. Rehman, N. Abbas, T. Saba, S. I. u. Rahman, Z. Mehmood, andH. Kolivand, “Classification of acute lymphoblastic leukemia using deep learning,” Microscopy Research and Technique, vol. 81, no. 11, pp. 1310– 1317, 2018.
- S. Bias and I. Kale, “Mobile hardware based implementation of a novel, efficient, fuzzy logic inspired edge detection technique for analysis of malaria infected microscopic thin blood images,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 141, pp. 374–381, 2018.
- V. Acharya and P. Kumar, “Detection of acute lymphoblastic leukemiausing image segmentation and data mining algorithms,” Medical & biological engineering & computing, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 1783– 1811, 2019.
- M. V. Caya, D. Padilla, G. Ombay, and A. J. Hernandez, “Detection and counting of red blood cells in human urine using canny edge detection and circle hough transform algorithms,” in 2019 IEEE 11th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM). IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–5.
- The datasets used in the second Cell Tracking Challenge edition,
- M. Ma ska, V. Ulman, D. Svoboda, P. Matula, P. Matula, C. Ederra, A. Urbiola, T. Espa na, S. Venkatesan, D. M. Balak et al., “A benchmark for comparison of cell tracking algorithms,” Bioinformatics, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1609–1617, 2014.
- The IMJ macro, CellProfiler pipelines, and images are currently
- A. G unes , H. Kalkan, and E. Durmus , “Optimizing the color-tograyscale conversion for image classification,” Signal, Image and Video Processing, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 853– 860, 2016