Open Access Journal

ISSN : 2394-2320 (Online)

International Journal of Engineering Research in Computer Science and Engineering (IJERCSE)

Monthly Journal for Computer Science and Engineering

Open Access Journal

International Journal of Engineering Research in Computer Science and Engineering (IJERCSE)

Monthly Journal for Computer Science and Engineering

ISSN : 2394-2320 (Online)

Review of Open Street Map Data Quality And its Assessment Tools

Author : Navneet Kaur 1 Sukhjit Singh Sehra 2 Sumeet Kaur Sehra 3

Date of Publication :7th June 2016

Abstract: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) has been becoming a significant source for understanding the surface of the Earth. VGI refers to the collection of huge spatial data with the help of people on voluntary basis. Open street map (OSM) project is one such example of VGI. Since contributors have varying levels of education, profession or skills, it has resulted into number of inconsistencies in OSM data. The aim of this study is to review the research that has been done for quality assessment of OSM data and the tools available for improving the quality of OSM data. It can be concluded that a number of quality assurance tools are available but many of them covers only specific parts of world and many evaluate errors that have little impact for most data uses. Also the densely populated areas are mapped better than sparsely populated areas as local editors being familiar with an area leads to more accurate OSM mapping.

Reference :

    1. M. Haklay and P. Weber, “Open street map: Usergenerated street maps,” Pervasive Computing, IEEE, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 12–18, 2008.
    2. M. Haklay, “How good is volunteered geographical information? a comparative study of Open street map and ordnance survey datasets,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 682–703, Aug. 2010.
    3. S. Sehra, J. Singh, and H. Rai, “A Systematic Study of Open street map Data Quality Assessment,” in 2014 11th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG), pp. 377– 381, Apr. 2014,.
    4. M. F. Goodchild, “Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography,” GeoJournal, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 211–221, Nov 2007.
    5. T. Hayakawa, Y. Imi, and T. Ito, “Analysis of Quality of Data in Open street map,” in 2012 IEEE 14th International Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing (CEC), pp. 131–134, Sep. 2012
    6. “Elements - Open street map Wiki,” accessed on 5th June 2016. [Online]. Available: http://wiki.open street map.org/wiki/Elements
    7. “Open street map Statistics,” accessed on 27th May 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.open street map.org/stats/data stats.html
    8. “Open street map Statistics,” accessed on 27th May 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.open street map.org/stats/data stats.html
    9. P. Neis, D. Zielstra, and A. Zipf, “The street network evolution of crowdsourced maps: Open street map in Germany 2007–2011,” Future Internet, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1–21, Dec 2011.
    10. O. Kounadi, “Assessing the quality of open street map data,” University College of London, Department of Civil, Environmental And Geomatic Engineering, pp. 9–21, 2009
    11. A. Coote and L. Rackham, “Neogeographic data quality is it an issue?” in the AGI Conference. ConsultingWhere Ltd, 2008.
    12. A. L. Ali and F. Schmid, “Data Quality Assurance for Volunteered Geographic Information,” in Geographic Information Science, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, M. Duckham, E. Pebesma, K. Stewart, and A. U. Frank, Eds. Springer International Publishing, no. 8728, pp. 126–141, Sep. 2014.
    13. v. P. Oort, “Spatial data quality: from description to application,” Ph.D. dissertation, Wageningen University, 2006.
    14. Not at Home on the Range: Peer Production and the Urban/Rural Divide. California, USA: ACM, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/20228
    15. O. Roick, J. Hagenauer, and A. Zipf, “OSMatrixgridbased analysis and visualization of Open street map,” Proceedings of the State of the Map Europe, Vienna, Austria, vol. 1517, p. 1517, 2011.
    16. “Open street map Data Quality” accessed on 4th June 2016. [Online]. Available: http://osmlab.github.io/osmdata-quality/
    17. X. Qian, L. Di, D. Li, P. Li, L. Shi, and L. Cai, “Data cleaning approaches in Web2.0 VGI application,” in 2009 17th International Conference on Geoinformatics, pp. 1–4, Aug. 2009.
    18. R. Karam and M. Melchiori, “A crowd sourcingbased framework for im- proving geo-spatial open data,” in 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Oct 2013.
    19. L. M. V. Blzquez, B. Villazn-Terrazas, V. Saquicela, A. d. Len, . Corcho, and A. Gmez-Prez, “GeoLinked data and inspire through an application case,” in Proceedings of the 18th SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, pp. 446– 449, Jan. 2010.
    20. P. Hashemi and R. A. Abbaspour, Assessment of Logical Consistency in Open street map Based on the Spatial Similarity Concept. Springer International Publishing, 2015.
    21. F. Ying, P. Mooney, P. Corcoran, and A. Winstanley, “Polygon Processing on Open street map XML Data,” in Proceedings of the GIS Research UK 18th Annual Conference, pp. 149–154, 2010.
    22. A. Vandecasteele and R. Devillers, “Improving volunteered geographic information quality using a tag recommender system: The case of Open street map,” in Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer Science mathplus Business Media, pp. 59–80, 2015.
    23. C. Brando and B. Bucher, “Quality in user generated spatial content: A matter of specifications,” in Proceedings of the 13th AGILE international conference on geographic information science. Springer Verlag: Guimar aes, Portugal, pp. 11–14, 2010
    24. A. L. Ali, F. Schmid, R. Al-Salman, and T. Kauppinen, “Ambiguity and plausibility: managing classification quality in volunteered geographic information,” in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSPATIAL Interna- tional Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. ACM, pp. 143–152, 2014.
    25. M. Helbich, C. Amelunxen, P. Neis, and A. Zipf, “Comparative spatial analysis of positional accuracy of Open street map and proprietary geodata,” Proceedings of GI Forum, 2012.
    26. B. Ciepluch, P. Mooney, and A. Winstanley, “Building generic quality indicators for Open street map,” 2011.
    27. A. Pourabdollah, J. Morley, S. Feldman, M. Jackson, and J. Campus, “Studying the Dynamic Patterns of Open street map Bugs in Great Britain,” in Proceedings of 16th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Leuven, Belgium, vol. 1417, 2013.
    28. “Quality assurance - Open street map Wiki,” accessed on 24th May 2016. [Online]. Available: http://wiki.open street map.org/wiki/Quality assurance
    29. “Osmose - Open street map Wiki,” accessed on 26th May 2016. [Online]. Available: http://wiki.open street map.org/wiki/Osmose
    30. “OSM Inspector - Open street map Wiki,” accessed on 26th May 2016. [Online]. Available: http://wiki.open street map.org/wiki/OSM Inspector
    31. “MapRoulette - Open street map Wiki,” accessed on 27th May 2016. [Online]. Available: http://wiki.open street map.org/wiki/MapRoulette
    32. “OWL – Open street map Wiki,” accessed on 27th May 2016. [Online]. Available: ht.tp://wiki.open street map.org/wiki/OWL

Recent Article